More
    HomeAnalysis & OpinionsFintechs Are Rising — But Africa’s Cross-Border Payments Still Depend on Europe and the US

    Fintechs Are Rising — But Africa’s Cross-Border Payments Still Depend on Europe and the US

    Published on

    spot_img

    Africa’s cross-border payments system is broken. Despite a surge in fintech innovation, businesses and consumers still face high costs, slow transactions, and unreliable infrastructure. A new report from African venture firm Oui Capital, seen by Launch Base Africa, dissects the structural gaps holding back the continent’s financial integration — and highlights where startups and regulators could intervene.

    The Problem: A Fragmented, Dollar-Dependent System

    At the heart of Africa’s cross-border payments crisis is its reliance on outdated financial infrastructure. The report identifies five key pain points:

    1. No Pan-African Clearing System
    • Unlike Europe’s SEPA or the US’s ACH, Africa lacks a unified clearing mechanism. Most intra-African transactions still route through correspondent banks in the US or Europe, adding fees and delays.

    2. Illiquid FX Markets

    • Many African currencies are thinly traded, forcing businesses to pay 5–10% in conversion fees — far higher than global averages.

    3. Fintechs and Banks Don’t Talk to Each Other

    • Poor API standardization means fintechs struggle to integrate with traditional banks, creating inefficiencies.

    4. Slow Adoption of PAPSS

    • The Pan-African Payment and Settlement System (PAPSS), designed to enable instant cross-border transactions, has seen sluggish uptake due to liquidity shortages and regulatory delays.

    5. Overdependence on SWIFT

    • African banks still rely heavily on SWIFT, which is expensive and slow compared to modern alternatives.

    Emerging Solutions: Can Fintech Fix This?

    The report outlines several potential fixes — some already in motion, others still aspirational:

    • Real-Time Settlement Systems
    • RTGS (Real-Time Gross Settlement) networks could bypass USD clearing, cutting costs and settlement times.
    • Decentralized FX Pools
    • Blockchain-based liquidity solutions, including stablecoins, could provide cheaper currency exchange without correspondent banks.
    • Standardized APIs
    • Open banking frameworks could improve interoperability between fintechs and banks.
    • Alternative Networks to SWIFT
    • Startups like Nala and Chipper Cash are building direct payment corridors, while PAPSS could eventually replace SWIFT for intra-African trade.

    The Risks Holding Fintechs Back

    Even with these innovations, fintechs face major hurdles:

    • Regulatory Whiplash
      Sudden policy shifts — like Nigeria’s crypto crackdown — create uncertainty. Compliance costs are high, with licensing processes taking years in some markets.
    • FX Volatility and Liquidity Shortages
      Startups offering FX loans or multi-currency accounts risk insolvency if currencies crash (e.g., Nigeria’s naira devaluation).
    • Brutal Competition
      Remittance fees have plummeted to 0.5–2%, squeezing margins. Customer acquisition costs ($5-$30 per user) further strain profitability.

    Where the Market is Heading? 

    The report predicts three major shifts:

    Decline of Traditional Remittance Giants

    • African fintechs like LemFi, Geegpay, and Chipper Cash are undercutting incumbents (Western Union, MoneyGram) with lower fees and digital-first models.

    Rise of Stablecoins and Crypto Payments

    • Despite regulatory hurdles, crypto-enabled remittances are growing as a workaround for FX inefficiencies.

    B2B Payments as the Next Frontier

    • SMEs and trade finance remain underserved. Startups that streamline cross-border invoices and supplier payments could unlock billions in trapped capital.

    What Needs to Happen Next?

    The report ends with clear calls to action:

    For Investors:

    • Back infrastructure plays (PAPSS adoption, FX liquidity solutions).
    • Bet on interoperability enablers rather than standalone fintech apps.

    For Founders:

    • Focus on SME payments and embedded finance (lending, insurance).
    • Prioritize partnerships with mobile money providers for last-mile reach.

    For Policymakers:

    • Harmonize regulations — a single African KYC framework could slash compliance costs.
    • Accelerate PAPSS adoption by mandating bank participation.
    • Test blockchain settlements instead of blanket crypto bans.

    The Bottom Line

    Africa’s cross-border payments system is ripe for disruption, but progress depends on collaboration between fintechs, banks, and regulators. Without systemic fixes, high costs and inefficiencies will persist — holding back trade and financial inclusion across the continent.

    Latest articles

    African Startup Deal Tracker — Newest Deals

    Here’s a closer look at the notable under-the-radar investment activity we’re tracking this week.

    AfricInvest Ends Multi-Year Bet on Egyptian Fintech MDP

    The company, co-founded and led by Ahmed Nafie, offers an end-to-end digital payment infrastructure solution across Africa and the Middle East.

    Delivery Wars Turn Ugly: Glovo’s Mounting Troubles in Moroccan Court

    For Glovo, which insists it is cooperating fully and remains committed to transparency, this latest development is a reputational headache layered on top of an already complex operating environment.

    Flutterwave, InTouch Licensed — But Most WAEMU Fintechs Still Frozen

    The BCEAO’s slow but ongoing release of approvals suggests the regulatory process is now in motion — but not yet at scale.

    More like this

    African Startup Deal Tracker — Newest Deals

    Here’s a closer look at the notable under-the-radar investment activity we’re tracking this week.

    AfricInvest Ends Multi-Year Bet on Egyptian Fintech MDP

    The company, co-founded and led by Ahmed Nafie, offers an end-to-end digital payment infrastructure solution across Africa and the Middle East.

    Delivery Wars Turn Ugly: Glovo’s Mounting Troubles in Moroccan Court

    For Glovo, which insists it is cooperating fully and remains committed to transparency, this latest development is a reputational headache layered on top of an already complex operating environment.