Earlier this week, Namibia’s Communications Regulatory Authority (CRAN) issued a stern cease-and-desist order to SpaceX’s Starlink, citing the satellite internet provider’s alleged operations within the country without the requisite licensing. The regulator has confiscated Starlink terminal equipment and initiated legal proceedings against individuals and entities found using or distributing the service illegally.
In a public statement on November 26, CRAN reiterated its commitment to enforcing the Communications Act (№8 of 2009), highlighting that the importation or use of Starlink equipment and services constitutes a violation of the law. Emilia Nghikembua, CEO of CRAN, stated that Starlink had applied for a telecommunications service license, but the application was still under review. Until the licensing process is resolved, all related activities are deemed unauthorized.
“The public is hereby advised not to purchase Starlink terminal equipment or subscribe to its services, as such activities are illegal under Namibian law,” the statement warned. CRAN also underscored its intent to take legal action against violators, with criminal cases already filed against individuals caught importing or distributing Starlink hardware.
Starlink’s potential entry into Namibia has generated significant interest, particularly among rural and underserved communities. Promising high-speed internet via its Low Earth Orbit (LEO) satellite network, Starlink is seen by many as a game-changer for regions with limited connectivity.
However, the regulatory impasse has left Namibians frustrated. Critics argue that the existing internet service providers have failed to meet the needs of rural areas, leaving them dependent on outdated or substandard infrastructure.
“Namibian internet providers are not delivering efficient services to the rural areas, so everyday people are struggling with the internet. We need Starlink now!” said one resident, echoing the sentiments of many across social media platforms.
Others expressed skepticism about the motivations behind the regulatory delays, accusing the government of protecting entrenched telecom providers. “Spiteful politics. We won’t allow YOU to own something that we also need, even if it makes everyone’s lives better,” wrote another critic.
The confrontation between CRAN and Starlink sheds light on the challenges faced by global satellite internet providers in navigating country-specific regulations. While Starlink’s technology has demonstrated the potential to bridge connectivity gaps in underserved regions, it also raises questions about balancing technological progress with regulatory oversight.
The Namibian government’s position reflects a broader concern for ensuring that all telecommunications services operate within established legal frameworks. By enforcing licensing requirements, CRAN aims to maintain a level playing field while safeguarding national interests.
Yet, for consumers struggling with slow and costly internet connections, the licensing delays are seen as a bureaucratic roadblock to progress. One disgruntled user lamented their reliance on existing services, describing speeds as low as 0.8 Mbps in the Kalahari region compared to Starlink’s advertised 180 Mbps.
Amid the controversy, Starlink has been expanding its presence across Africa. Paratus Group, a telecommunications operator, recently announced an agreement to distribute Starlink services across the continent, adding another layer of complexity to Namibia’s stance. The partnership is expected to facilitate broader access to high-speed internet, albeit contingent on regulatory approvals in each country.
Starlink and SpaceX have yet to issue a formal response to CRAN’s cease-and-desist order. Meanwhile, the standoff raises critical questions about the future of global connectivity, regulatory compliance, and the role of innovation in bridging digital divides.