After a year marked by multiple startup closures, Kenya’s venture ecosystem is undergoing a fundamental transformation. What emerges in 2025 looks less like the Pan-African tech hub once envisioned and more like a specialised infrastructure development zone, powered by new capital sources and dominated by a single sector.
The Japanese influx
Japanese capital has arrived in force. At least 12 Japanese entities are now actively investing in Kenyan startups, deploying over $40 million in disclosed funding during 2025 according to Launch Base Africa’s data. This makes Japanese investors among the most active foreign groups in the country’s current landscape.
The deployment strategy is methodical. Suzuki Global Ventures, together with Japan Bank for International Cooperation and other Japanese institutions, invested $11 million in Peach Cars, a used vehicle financing platform. AAIC Investment and Ohara Pharmaceutical co-led a $9.6 million round for MyDawa, a healthtech company. GB-IX and other Japanese investors committed $12.7 million to Hakki Africa, a fintech serving SMEs.
This push follows the 2024 Tokyo International Conference on African Development. The approach emphasises patient capital for long-term projects rather than rapid exits, though many beneficiaries have been startups founded by Japanese nationals. Japanese investors show particular interest in healthcare, mobility, and fintech — sectors that mirror Japan’s domestic priorities around ageing populations and automotive market shifts.
Climate’s complete dominance
Climate and energy startups now command roughly 80% of Kenyan venture capital, a concentration unmatched anywhere else in Africa. Three companies alone — Sun King, CrossBoundary Energy, and Burn Manufacturing — captured $326 million of Kenya’s estimated $400 million in disclosed funding this year, representing 82% of the total.
The capital structures being deployed challenge traditional venture definitions. Sun King’s $156 million deal was a securitisation, bundling over 500,000 customer payment contracts into securities purchased by Kenyan banks and European development finance institutions. Customers pay approximately $2 weekly for three years; Sun King sold those future payment streams upfront for immediate cash without diluting equity.
Other climate companies are adopting similar approaches. KOKO Networks raised $10 million in debt; CrossBoundary Energy secured a $45 million debt facility separate from its equity round. Kenya is pioneering debt structures that could reshape how African startups access growth capital.
This concentration creates distortions. Founders building fintech, e-commerce, or consumer technology in Kenya may struggle to attract investor attention. Agritech remains underfunded despite the country’s agricultural economy. Proptech is virtually non-existent despite Nairobi’s construction activity. E-commerce appears largely abandoned after setbacks including the closures of Lipa Later, Sendy and Copia Global.
The missing angels
One ecosystem component remains broken: angel investing. The Nairobi Business Angel Network disclosed just two investments in 2025 — and one backed an Ethiopian company, not a Kenyan one.
Current funding data shows no named Kenyan high-net-worth individuals actively deploying angel capital. This contrasts sharply with Egypt or South Africa, where successful operators regularly write early-stage cheques.
Several factors may explain the void. Safaricom’s market dominance may have concentrated wealth among corporate executives who prefer traditional investments over startups. Development finance institutions may have crowded out angels by providing early-stage capital directly, allowing climate companies to raise $5–10 million without seed rounds. The angel investor retreat is likely a direct response to the heavy losses suffered during recent startup failures.
The absence creates a brutal dynamic for non-climate startups. They cannot raise $500,000 to $2 million rounds locally. Options narrow to targeting international angels, pivoting to climate technology to access development finance, or relocating operations.
A specialised future
Kenya’s ecosystem has become highly specialised. It excels at climate infrastructure financed through debt, built by international teams, backed by development finance institutions. For founders in this category, Kenya may offer the continent’s best environment.
For everyone else, the landscape appears inhospitable. The question facing Kenya is whether this specialisation represents strategic positioning or dangerous narrowness. Climate infrastructure could generate steady returns for decades, establishing Kenya as a global testing ground for sustainable technology deployment. But if climate funding cycles turn, or if non-climate sectors continue deteriorating, Kenya risks ceding its position as East Africa’s innovation centre.
Whether the current trajectory represents success or failure depends largely on perspective — and on what one believes startups should be building.
Further reading: