The United States remains open for business — at least for foreign entrepreneurs willing to navigate an evolving visa landscape and pay higher fees. As of October 1, 2024, a new pricing structure will take effect for the International Entrepreneur Rule (IER), an Obama-era initiative that allows startup founders to enter and remain in the U.S. on a case-by-case basis if they demonstrate significant public benefit through their business ventures.

A Visa by Any Other Name…

The IER, a form of discretionary parole rather than a traditional visa, has been an exercise in political limbo. Introduced in 2017, then swiftly slated for elimination under the Trump administration, the rule ultimately survived multiple legal and bureaucratic tussles. Now, the Trump administration is not only keeping it but also adjusting its financial thresholds to reflect inflation — because even immigration rules need to keep up with the Consumer Price Index.

The revised investment and revenue criteria will apply to all applications filed on or after October 1, 2024. Under the new requirements:

• If relying on investment from a qualified investor, the threshold increases from $264,147 to $311,071.
• If relying on a government award or grant, the required amount rises from $105,659 to $124,429.
• The revenue benchmark for re-parole consideration jumps from $528,293 to $622,142.

For venture capitalists or government funders looking to back such entrepreneurs, the minimum investment in startups within a five-year period will increase from $633,952 to $746,571. Additionally, these investments must have led to the creation of at least five jobs or generated at least $622,142 in revenue per qualifying startup.

Who Gets In?

To qualify under IER, entrepreneurs must own at least 10% of their startup at the time of application and play a central role in its operations. The startup itself must have been formed within the last five years and show strong growth potential. Up to three founders per startup may apply.

Once granted, the initial parole period lasts up to 2.5 years, with the possibility of an extension for another 2.5 years if additional benchmarks in funding, job creation, or revenue are met. Spouses may apply for work authorization, but children of the entrepreneur remain ineligible. 

The IER stands in stark contrast to the broader U.S. immigration landscape, where policies fluctuate with each administration’s stance. The Trump era is seeing sweeping crackdowns on both legal and illegal immigration, with the IER nearly being scrapped in the process. 

The philosophy behind the IER seems to be that while foreign entrepreneurs may contribute significantly to the economy, their presence in the U.S. should be contingent on strict economic performance metrics. The increase in investment thresholds reflects not just inflation but also the government’s view that only the most well-backed and successful startups should have a shot at staying.

The Reality Check for Founders

For aspiring entrepreneurs, the IER offers a route into the U.S. startup ecosystem — but it is not without its hurdles. Unlike a visa, parole status does not lead to permanent residency. At the end of five years, founders must either secure a more permanent visa or return to their home countries, regardless of the success of their businesses.

Moreover, the parole visa designation means the US Department of Homeland Security (DHS) retains broad discretion to deny applications. While the program provides a legal avenue for startup founders, it remains a temporary solution at best. Entrepreneurs must prove their worth quickly, or risk being shown the door.

The Bottom Line

America still wants foreign startup founders — just not for free. The updated IER requirements reinforce the notion that while innovation is welcome, it must come with a financial backing substantial enough to warrant entry. For those willing to meet the new thresholds, the U.S. remains an attractive, albeit increasingly expensive, place to build a business. But as history has shown, the rules can change with the next administration, meaning today’s door could become tomorrow’s wall.